Our Posthuman Future Summary Essay

Chapter 1At the beginning of Our Post gay Future by Francis Fukuyama, it talks well-nigh ii different books 1984 and Brave New World. These books talk approximately multiple technologies that would change and shape the next two generations. For the decade that these books were published it had them think that having a utopian world would feature no consequences. I disagree with it for the most part, because if we are fixd to have certain qualities or char numbereristics accordingly we would lose the infering of what it conveys to be valet.It referred to invetro fertilization and Fukoyama thought it was a deal with the devil. And it is in a appearance. We shouldnt be anyowed to mess with the creation of life or choose what they would look standardised, how they would act middling because there might be that off guess that they may blame the parents instead of themselves. Biotechnology is non something to be trifled with. You mustiness be careful with your steps or fac e the consequences of what the aftermath may be. Basically chapter unrivaled creates a visual for the future of the human race if evolution is pushed to far then we impart face our own destruction that we caused.Chapter 2So the beginning of chapter two talks about molecular biology and how it could help with the prevention of contract adapted diseases like breast rearcer and cystic fibrosis. In a way this give help our ability to improve ourselves and gives us room to grow and see with the technological revolution. Francis mentions that we face ethical choices about genetic privacy, proper uses of drugs and human cloning. And we truthfully do. It goes back to what we trust is right and wrong unless we have to keep in the fine line in between. If we think about it, one human cloning does have its benefits. The chances of getting a genetic disease or dying due to a low immune system would s incessantlyely decrease. But then it goes back to losing our human qualities and person ality.But with the upcoming future we pull up stakes have to face these issues for enhancements or else than therapeutic reasons. And by enhancements there may be a way to make the genetics of homosexuality and possibly plan a plan for the parents to reduce the likelihood that they will give birth to a gay child. Its rather sad that an expectant mother would takings a pill or have something injected into the fetus just so they wouldnt have to worry about the harassment. Even if you say you are against antigay variation then you should stick to that decision, give the person a choice before they are suitable to make it themselves.Chapter 3Chapter three talks about the advances in the field of neuropharmacology. It in like manner talks about Freudianism that was built on the premise that mental illness was primarily psychological in disposition. This caused doctors to try drug therapy rather than talk therapy. One used was Lithium it cured a number of battalion and then led to other drugs like Prozac and Ritalin. These drugs helped relax the mentally ill and calmed them down. The drug Prozac is an anti-depressant that supposedly changed this girls life around for the better. While I do believe that her doctor over-exaggerated I think most doctors do.why would they explain every possible side effect like memory loss, violence, weight gain and the big one suicide. It definitely should not be overconfident as a wonder drug because of the long term side effects. Although like with most drugs, when they are first distributed they truthfully dont take in its genetic makeup, even with testing and trials. But by infrastanding them better now and how they affect the human body we are now able to understand the neurotransmitters, such as dopamine and serotonin.These two transmitters control the messages of the brain that stub alter our feelings of wellness, happiness, jealousy and fear. I feel that if the knowledge of the brain functions are able to be alter ed then it can cause a political standing.Francis talks about self-esteem that can only come through by fulfilling our human desire of acknowledgment. I suppose if the drugs can give us a feeling of righteousness then in might help the picture that seems to follow us because of the world around us. But I doubt it will give us the motivation for us to set our own ideals. I still believe that these few drugs are not good for us. With our luck there will probably be an unforeseen side-effect and then where would we be, back to lame one.Chapter 4Chapter four talks about the prolongation of life and the increase of life expectancies. In a way this is a bad economically because of affable security and other retirement benefits. It also talks about evolutionary biologists that 10 to believe that aging is caused by genes and that there are no shortcuts to the keep of death. I do tend to agree with this for the most part. It does not matter frequently how you live your life because any thing can cause your clock time to end in a moment. No one knows when a person is going to die because there are too many operators to consider. Another theory is that the body loses its functionality and just dies.And then there is also the Hayflick Limit, where environmental factors prevent the accurate copying of DNA. I think that if someone were to die due to health issues it would follow more of this idea. In time I do believe that the view point of death will change. Will a person be able to understand that their body is going out or will they fight tooth and nail to stay alive? Fear of dying plagues us all. We may be able to understand more why we die in 2050 but that does not mean we will be prepared. I do not think we will ever be over our apprehension of dying, that is what we will have with us at all times because we are human.Chapter 5Chapter five is all about genetic engineering. Genetic engineering is definitely a huge controversy and has been for many years. The pr oject was funded by the US and other governments across the globe. There was, of course, the familiar competition and the want to be first. It seems with anything there is that pride when the secrets are unlocked to something (DNA) so complex. With the success of the cloned Dolly sheep, some began to wonder if cloning humans would ever work. I personally do not believe we should be able to.There has to be a reason why our bodies are designed to create life, instead of in a cold laboratory. Not to mention why would someone want to clone themselves? Another technology under study would be artificial chromosomes. Scientists want to add an extra chromosome to the 46 we already possess.They not only want to create one, but they want to be able to crook it on or off with the persons consent when they are of age. For them to be able to actually create this would be extremely difficult if not impossible. Every one of our chromosomes serves a purpose so how would they be able to create one that does something different? Would it bring false hope that this person would be a extremely genius, or have the inability to cause harm? Cloning anything is beyond difficult and causes plenty of moral and social concerns.Chapter 6Chapter six is pretty much about why we should worry about biotechnology. It starts off talking about eugenics (deliberate breeding of people with desirable traits). Western countries actually had laws that permitted the state to sterilize people them deem imbeciles. I dont understand how they can just not give someone a chance to bring life into this world. most(prenominal) of the time a person becomes desperate and that is why they have to turn to a life of crime or do things they normally wouldnt do. give someone finally grew a conscious and the popularity of eugenics in most places, except for the Asian territories where they have the one child per family law. They did not understand at the time that with most traits or characteristics have to be inherited by both parents. Since World War 2 eugenics has been associated with racism because of the discrimination it perceives towards certain groups of people.Its almost like telling a child that they cant play with the blue-eyed children because they are no good. It is ridiculous on its own. There is always the chance that eugenics will pop back up, and if it does it will cause the parents to make decisions. The parent does ultimately have the decision but if pushed or persuaded a certain way it can change their course. We collect to let people make their own decisions because if we dont then how will we learn from them?Chapter 7Chapter seven is all about human rights. There is an unbelievable amount of rights that we Democracy people think we should have. Not only that but it turns out that abortion is protected under the first amendment. We do have the right to choose whether or not we want to have a child. Its because we have choices and the right to choose. Basically the i nvent right implies moral judgment.Truthfully I believe we do need rights, no matter what form they come in. to not have right is like going back to the 18th century when everything revolved around power and politics. It didnt matter what you wanted the courts decided for you. Our human nature has changed and developed into something kinder on the ways. Granted there are times when we feel as though we have no choice but to do this or that, but we can choose to not do something or hell go and do something for the better. of course consequences usually play a role in thing but the fact that we have a right to choose what we would rather do for ourselves is a vast improvement.Chapter 8Chapter eight talks about how human nature has been extremely controversial. Most of the speculation is about that fine line between nature and nurture. Truthfully there is a fine line between them. You must know where the line is to know when to protect and when to show tough love. This could change th e characteristics and how it affects the child. Francis also kind of talks about environmental impacts and it plays a big role. Depending on the environment it can change how human being s react in difficult situations.Chapter 9Much of politics centers on the question of human dignity and the desire for recognition to which it is related. This means that we humans want to be constantly recognized by our dignity, or by which ever group we bear on in. And it is very true. We constantly strive to be noticed in school for our good grades, by making that winning catch in a feeble or by just being ourselves. We also desire to have respect by our peers something that is rarely achieved. Francis goes on to talk about a factor X.Factor X is in all humans and should be respected no matter which class, skin color or gender you are. In a way its like factor X is what makes us human. If you cause harm on something without the chromosome then its ok but if you enslave, torture or kill someone w ith the chromosome then its a crime against humanity. For many societies the X factor was contributed to the upper ranking people. But factor X is the elemental meaning of what it is to be human. Without it what are we? If we lose the idea of a factor X then it will more than likely have us return to discrimination at full force. Its not fair what humans have had to go through because they lack a single chromosome.Chapter 10Chapter ten is about the political control of biotechnology. The government must regulate the research of biotechnology to ensure public safety. Without regulations so many bad things can snuff it its almost idiotic. Francis believes that the debate over biotechnology is held captive by extremists from either side, one side being the ones who are with it, the other the ones who are against it. Im leaning towards the ones who are against it. I believe that should be banned completely. I do think that biotechnology can be controlled but to do so would be difficu lt. But the real question is how? Scientists cannot police themselves and therefore someone must watch over them.A team of individuals that would have a broad viewpoint would be able to be the police but to find such would be difficult. A ban on biotechnology can happen and maybe will but laws do change over time to fit the socialness of the time. The only area that will probably still go for the bio tech would be East Asia. Really because of their religion, and because eugenics wasnt abused much over there. I still feel as though biotechnology should not be tried but then again we cannot stop the minds of scientists and they will always try to do the impossible because of their nature.Chapter 11Chapter eleven is all about how biotechnology is regulated today. There is the self-regulation by scientists or industry and the statutory which is basically the government. The government varies in strictness, big surprise there. With anything government, law or policy, it will always be mo re strict.Responsibilities are divided out so that they can be followed more closely or better I suppose. It also depends on where you are looking at regulations. Germany is the strictest, Britain the most relaxed and most other places are somewhere in between. As time goes on the laws and regulations have begun to decoct due to scandals and tragedies. Its unfortunate that it takes something bad to happen before safety and precautions are more of a concern.Chapter 12Chapter twelve, the FINAL CHAPTER, is about policies for the future. We do need to keep in mind that with time change comes. As of now new laws are being formulated on whether human experimentation applies to embryos. Francis does believe that the scientific community is too permissive, and that most scientists or bioethicists base things on the side of science. And I tend to agree here, to be a bioethicists your moral build will be far greater than the average Joe.They must believe that they are finding ways to help t he science community by calculate out ways to stop deficiencies in our DNA. With human cloning you dont know how the child will react when they reach maturity. I mean they would be an exact copy of another person without the connection. More than likely it will turn out bad and then we will just have a band of adolescents hating their parents, and the scientist who created them. Truth be told a clone really isnt a human being. It is more of a replica of what a human is. Also if they try to mix human DNA with animals then the whole definition of human would change completely.